Skip to main content

Monitor AI Coding Assistant Abuse

AI coding assistants like Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and others are transforming software development. But they also introduce new security risks that traditional tools don't address.

The Challenge​

  • Insecure code suggestions: AI may suggest code with vulnerabilities
  • Policy violations: Generated code may violate security standards
  • Data exposure: Developers may share sensitive code with AI services
  • Lack of visibility: Security teams can't see what developers are doing with AI
  • Compliance gaps: No audit trail for AI-assisted development

How LangGuard Helps​

Visibility Into AI-Assisted Development​

LangGuard aggregates traces from coding assistants to show:

  • What prompts developers are sending
  • What code suggestions AI is providing
  • Which repositories and projects are involved
  • Patterns of usage across the organization

Automated Security Scanning​

Built-in policies detect high-risk patterns:

RiskDetection
SQL InjectionAI-suggested code with injection vulnerabilities
Hardcoded secretsCredentials in generated code
Insecure patternsUnsafe function usage, missing validation
Policy violationsCode that violates organizational standards

SOC Analyst Context​

When a violation is detected, analysts get:

  • Full conversation: The prompt and AI response
  • Developer context: Who requested the code
  • Project context: What they were working on
  • Risk assessment: Severity and category
  • Evidence: Specific code that triggered the policy

Getting Started​

1. Connect Your Observability Platform​

If your coding assistants send traces to an observability platform (Langfuse, LangSmith, etc.), connect that integration to LangGuard.

2. Enable Security Policies​

Turn on relevant policies:

  • SQL Injection Prevention - Catches vulnerable database code
  • Sensitive Data Access - Detects credentials in code
  • PII Detection - Flags personal data exposure

3. Configure Alerts​

Set up notifications for your security team:

  1. Navigate to policy settings
  2. Configure severity thresholds
  3. Set notification preferences (coming soon)

Example Detection​

Developer Prompt:

Write a function to get user data from the database by ID

AI Response:

def get_user(user_id):
    query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"
    return db.execute(query)

Policy Violation:

  • Policy: SQL Injection Prevention
  • Severity: High
  • Evidence: String interpolation in SQL query
  • Developer: dev@company.com
  • Project: user-service
  • Recommendation: Use parameterized queries

Investigation Workflow​

When a violation is flagged:

1. Review the Context​

  • What was the developer trying to accomplish?
  • Is the suggested code actually being used?
  • Is this a false positive?

2. Assess the Risk​

  • Could this code reach production?
  • What's the potential impact if exploited?
  • Are there other similar patterns?

3. Take Action​

SeverityAction
LowLog for trend analysis
MediumNotify developer, suggest fix
HighAlert security team, block if possible
CriticalImmediate escalation, stop deployment

4. Follow Up​

  • Ensure vulnerable code isn't merged
  • Educate developer on secure patterns
  • Update policies if needed

Metrics & Reporting​

Track AI coding assistant security over time:

  • Violation trends: Are security issues increasing or decreasing?
  • Top violations: Which policies trigger most often?
  • Developer patterns: Who needs additional training?
  • Project risk: Which codebases have the most issues?

Best Practices​

  1. Don't block everything: Start with monitoring, then add enforcement
  2. Educate developers: Most violations are unintentional
  3. Focus on high-risk code: Database queries, authentication, encryption
  4. Review regularly: Check violations weekly as a team
  5. Update policies: Add custom rules for your tech stack